RESEARCH PAPER
Simultaneous HIV and lymphocyte CD4+ testing as an intervention for improving linkage to care – experience of a voluntary counselling and testing facility-based pilot programme
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2017-04-07
Final revision date: 2017-11-23
Acceptance date: 2018-01-18
Publication date: 2018-03-13
HIV & AIDS Review 2018;17(1):8-11
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Simultaneous lymphocyte CD4+ and HIV testing has been proposed as a method for shortening the time between human immunodeficency syndrome (HIV) diagnosis and combined anti¬retroviral therapy (cART) initiation, thus improving clinical outcomes. Here, we investigate its impact on the linkage to care in voluntary counselling and testing centers (VCT) in Warsaw.
Material and methods:
All clients, who presented at the two VCTs in Warsaw and had positive ELISA tests, were offered the lymphocyte CD4+ test simultaneously with the WB test. All tests were anonymous. Data collected between 2012-2013 from the VCTs were linked with HIV clinic records using the WB test numbers as unique identifiers. Persons registered in HIV clinics were considered linked to care.
Results:
In total, during 2012-2013, one hundred and twenty-three clients were tested as HIV-positive in the VCTs. Of these, 30 had their lymphocyte CD4+ count tested, while 42 (65.8%) clients were linked to HIV care. The linkage rate did not differ between the lymphocyte CD4+ test groups (66.7% of tested vs. 65.6% of non-tested for the lymphocyte CD4+; p = 0.91). There was also no significant difference in time to linkage, p = 0.52. In total, 66 (65.8%) clients started cART – 19 (28.8%) in the lymphocyte CD4+ group, and 47 (71.2%) in other (p = 0.07). However, there was a significant difference in the time for starting cART, p = 0.005.
Conclusions:
In Poland, a resource-rich country, simultaneous lymphocyte CD4+ and HIV testing at counselling and testing centers had no effect on linkage to care, but did have a positive impact on time to starting cART.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Adler A, Mounier-Jack S, Coker RJ. Late diagnosis of HIV in Europe: definitional and public health challenges. AIDS Care 2009; 21: 284-293.
2.
Hamers FF, Phillips AN. Diagnosed and undiagnosed HIV-infected populations in Europe. HIV Med 2008; 9 Suppl 2: 6-12.
3.
Mocroft A, Lundgren JD, Sabin ML, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for late presentation for HIV-positive persons in Europe: results from the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe Study (COHERE). PLoS Med 2013; 10: e1001510.
4.
Hogg R, Lima V, Sterne JA, et al. Life expectancy of individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy in high-income countries: a collaborative analysis of 14 cohort studies. Lancet 2008; 372: 293-299.
5.
Lodi S, Dray-Spira R, Touloumi G, et al. Delayed HIV diagnosis and initiation of antiretroviral therapy: inequalities by educational level, COHERE in EuroCoord. AIDS 2014; 28: 2297-2306.
6.
Antinori A, Coenen T, Costagiola D, et al. Late presentation of HIV infection: a consensus definition. HIV Med 2011; 12: 61-64.
7.
Rosinska M, Simmons R, Marzec-Boguslawska A, et al. Relating HIV testing patterns in Poland to risky and protective behavior. AIDS Care 2016; 28: 423-431.
8.
Ankiersztejn-Bartczak M, Firlag-Burkacka E, Czeszko-Paprocka H, et al. Factors responsible for incomplete linkage to care after HIV diagnosis: preliminary results from the Test and Keep in Care (TAK) project. HIV Med 2015; 16: 88-94.
9.
Kowalska JD, Shepherd L, Ankiersztejn-Bartczak M, et al. Poor Linkage to Care Despite Significant Improvement in Access to Early cART in Central Poland – Data from Test and Keep in Care (TAK) Project. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0162739.
10.
Gisslen M, Svedhem V, Lindborg L, et al. Sweden, the first country to achieve the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)/World Health Organization (WHO) 90-90-90 continuum of HIV care targets. HIV Med 2017; 18: 305-307.
11.
Mocroft A, Lundgren J, Antinori A, et al. Late presentation for HIV care across Europe: update from the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) study, 2010 to 2013. Euro Surveill 2015; 20: doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.47.30070.
12.
Wynberg E, Cooke G, Shroufi A, et al. Impact of point-of-care CD4 testing on linkage to HIV care: a systematic review. J Int AIDS Society 2014; 17: 18809.
13.
Vojnov L, Markby J, Boeke C, et al. POC CD4 Testing Improves Linkage to HIV Care and Timeliness of ART Initiation in a Public Health Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0155256.
14.
Varas-Diaz N, Neilands TB, Rodriguez-Madera SL, Padilla M. The role of emotions in the reduction of HIV/AIDS stigma among physicians in training. AIDS Care 2016; 28: 376-383.
15.
Deblonde J, De Koker P, Hamers FF, et al. Barriers to HIV testing in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health 2010; 20: 422-432.
16.
Flowers P, Duncan B, Knussen C. Re-appraising HIV testing: an exploration of the psychosocial costs and benefits associated with learning one's HIV status in a purposive sample of Scottish gay men. Br J Health Psychol 2003; 8 (Pt 2): 179-194.
17.
de Wit JB, Adam PC. To test or not to test: psychosocial barriers to HIV testing in high-income countries. HIV Med 2008; 9 Suppl 2: 20-22.