RESEARCH PAPER
Assessing the accuracy of self-reporting HIV testing behaviour in Houston/Harris County, Texas
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2018-06-21
Acceptance date: 2019-02-06
Publication date: 2019-03-28
HIV & AIDS Review 2019;18(1):50-56
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began directly estimating
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence based upon the Serologic Testing Algorithm for Recent HIV Seroconversion (STARHS) and individuals’ testing and treatment history, collected as part of the HIV Incidence Surveillance (HIS) system. The algorithm relies largely upon individuals’ self-reported testing history. The primary objective of this study is to describe the methodology and procedures used to assess the similarities between self-reported and medical record data on HIV status and the dates of first positive and last negative tests.
Material and methods:
The testing history from the individuals is used in combination with the latest laboratory assay tests to obtain a direct population-based estimate of HIV incidence. Understanding how accurate the self-report testing information is will help in estimating HIV incidence.
Partnerships were made with the medical clinics and Counselling and Testing facilities, and the participants were recruited from the patients attending these facilities. Participants were interviewed to ascertain the self-report of HIV test, HIV status, the date and location of the most recent HIV-negative test and the first HIV-positive test. Medical record abstraction was done after participants’ authorisation to compare the accuracy of self-report testing data.
Results:
The participants’ response rate was 83.7%, and the most common reason of not participating was lack of interest in the study. Data analysis is reported by CDC and Houston Health Department in a separate article.
Conclusions:
The methodology and procedures adopted in this study can be adopted, replicated, and improved in future studies exploring self-report accuracy.
REFERENCES (24)
1.
Biggar RJ, Rosenberg PS. HIV infection/AIDS in the United States during the 1990s. Clin Infect Dis 1993; 17 Suppl 1: S219-223.
2.
Brookmeyer R. Reconstruction and future trends of the AIDS epidemic in the United States. Science 1991; 253: 37-42.
3.
Karon JM, Khare M, Rosenberg PS. The current status of methods for estimating the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus in the United States of America. Stat Med 1998; 17: 127-142.
4.
Rosenberg PS. Backcalculation models of age-specific HIV incidence rates. Stat Med 1994; 13: 1975-1990.
5.
Rosenberg PS. Scope of the AIDS epidemic in the United States. Science 1995; 270: 1372-1375.
6.
Hall HI, Song R, Rhodes P, et al. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA 2008; 300: 520-529.
7.
Karon JM, Fleming PL, Steketee RW, De Cock KM. HIV in the United States at the turn of the century: an epidemic in transition. Am.
8.
J Public Health 2001; 91: 1060-1068.
9.
Parekh BS, Kennedy MS, Dobbs T, et al. Quantitative detection of increasing HIV type 1 antibodies after seroconversion: a simple assay for detecting recent HIV infection and estimating incidence. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2002; 18: 295-307.
10.
CDC. Revised surveillance case definitions for HIV infection among adults, adolescents and children aged <18 months and for HIV infection and AIDS among children aged 18 to <13 years – United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008; 57(RR-10): 1-12.
11.
Prejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, et al. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006-2009. PLoS One 2011; 6: e17502.
12.
CDC. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006; 55(RR-14): 1-17.
13.
Chan EC, Vernon SW, Ahn C, Greisinger A. Do men know that they have had a prostate-specific antigen test? Accuracy of self-.
14.
reports of testing at 2 sites. Am J Public Health 2004; 94: 1336-1338.
15.
Hall HI, Van Den Eeden SK, Tolsma DD, et al. Testing for prostate and colorectal cancer: comparison of self-report and medical record audit. Prev Med 2004; 39: 27-35.
16.
Volk RJ, Cass AR. The accuracy of primary care patients’ self-reports of prostate-specific antigen testing. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22: 56-58.
17.
Zapka JG, Bigelow C, Hurley T, et al. Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: the accuracy of self-report. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 1016-1021.
18.
Bignami-Van Assche S, Chao LW, Anglewicz P, et al. The validity of self-reported likelihood of HIV infection among the general population in rural Malawi. Sex Transm Infect 2007; 83: 35-40.
19.
Fisher DG, Reynolds GL, Jaffe A, Johnson ME. Reliability, sensitivity and specificity of self-report of HIV test results. AIDS Care 2007; 19: 692-696.
20.
McCusker J, Stoddard AM, McCarthy E. The validity of self-reported HIV antibody test results. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 567-569.
21.
Pedrana AE, Hellard ME, Guy R, et al. The difference in self-reported and biological measured HIV prevalence: implications for HIV prevention. AIDS Behav 2012; 16: 1454-1463.
22.
Yudin MH, Barbara AM, Guenter D, et al. Medical records and women’s self-report are not reliable sources for determining whether prenatal HIV testing was done. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006; 28: 867-872.
23.
McCoy SI, Jones B, Leone PA, et al. Variability of the date of HIV diagnosis: a comparison of self-report, medical record, and HIV/AIDS surveillance data. Ann Epidemiol 2010; 20: 734-742.
24.
An Q, Chronister K, Song R, et al. Comparison of self-reported HIV testing data with medical records data in Houston, TX 2012-2013. Ann Epidemiol 2016; doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.02.013 [Epub ahead of print].