RESEARCH PAPER
A structural model of HIV risk-taking intentions in Barbados
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2017-01-26
Final revision date: 2018-02-07
Acceptance date: 2018-11-19
Publication date: 2019-03-15
HIV & AIDS Review 2019;18(1):62-69
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive explanation of human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) (sexual) risk-taking intentions in Barbados using an extended model derived from the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) using structural equation modelling (SEM). The study extends this model by including two other factors essential for the prediction of an individual’s intention
to engage in unsafe sexual behaviours: knowledge about HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and perceived risk of or susceptibility to HIV infection.
Material and methods:
A structured questionnaire was used as the main data collection tool. The main constructs were: HIV Risk-taking Intentions, Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioural Control, Knowledge of HIV/AIDS, and Perceived Risk. Three models were tested: SEM; a direct effects model; and the traditional TPB model.
Results:
The traditional TPB model performed best. Attitudes and perceived behavioural control were significant predictors of HIV risk-taking intentions; knowledge of HIV/AIDS and perceived risk of HIV infection had no influence.
Conclusions:
Behavioural change interventions should focus on changing attitudes towards sex and sexual behaviours among individuals since attitudes are important determinants of intentions. In terms of perceived behavioural control, efforts should be made to identify those persons who find it difficult to control their sexual behaviours. Enhancing these individuals’ self-efficacy beliefs and confidence
about condom use and other safe sex practices would curb intentions to engage in risky sexual practices as well as actual behaviours.
REFERENCES (19)
1.
UNAIDS. 2016 Report on the global AIDS epidemic. UNAIDS, Geneva 2016.
2.
Barden-O’Fallon JL, deGraft-Johnson J, Biaika, T, et al. Factors associated with HIV/AIDS knowledge and risk perception in rural Malawi. AIDS Behav 2004; 8: 131-140.
3.
Ganczak M, Boron-Kaczmarska A, Leszczyszyn-Pynka M, Szych Z. Polish adolescents and their beliefs and attitudes to HIV/AIDS and sexual relationships. Sex Education 2005; 5: 1-14.
4.
Heeren GA, Jemmott III JB, Mandeya A, Tyler JC. Theory-based predictors of condom use among university students in the united states and South Africa. AIDS Educ Prev 2007; 19: 1-12.
5.
Jemmott III JB, Heeren GA, Ngwane N, et al. Theory of planned behaviour predictors of intention to use condoms among Xhosa adolescents in South Africa. Aids Care 2007; 19: 677-684.
6.
Merakou K, Costopoulos C, Marcopoulou J, Kourea-Kremastinou J. Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour after 15 years of HIV/AIDS prevention in schools. Eur J Public Health 2002; 12: 90-93.
7.
Serlo KL, Aavarinne H. Attitudes of university students towards HIV/AIDS. J Adv Nurs 1999; 29: 463-470.
8.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50: 179-211.
9.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison Wesley, Reading 1975.
10.
Kok G, Hospers HJ, Harterink P, De Zwart O. Social-cognitive determinants of HIV risk-taking intentions among men who date men through the Internet. AIDS Care 2007; 19: 410-417.
11.
Rosenstock IM. The health belief model and preventive health behaviour. Health Education Monographs 1974; 2: 354-386.
12.
Catania JA, Kegeles SM, Coates TJ. Towards and understanding of risk behaviour: an AIDS reduction model. Health Education Quarterly 1990; 17: 53-72.
13.
Gregson S, Zhuwau T, Anderson RM, Chandiwana SK. Is there evidence for behaviour change in response to AIDS in rural Zimbabwe? Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 321-330.
14.
Spira R, Lagarde E, Bouyer J, et al. Preventative attitudes towards the threat of AIDS: Process and determinants in rural Senegal. AIDS Educ Prev 2000; 12: 54-556.
15.
Carey MP, Schroder KEE. Development and psychometric evaluation of the brief HIV knowledge questionnaire (HIV-KQ-18). AIDS Educ Prev 2002; 14: 174-184.
16.
Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 1988; 103: 411-423.
17.
Meyers LS, Gamst G, Guarino AJ. Applied multivariate research: Design and Interpretation. Sage, Thousand Oaks 2006.
18.
Coffman DL, MacCallum RC. Using parcels to convert path analysis models into latent variable models. Multivariate Behav Res 2005; 40: 235-259.
19.
Stevens JP. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 4th ed. Erlbaum, Hillsdale 2002.