RESEARCH PAPER
Should cryptococcal antigen screening be considered as a routine procedure in antiretroviral therapy naïve severely immunocompromised HIV-seropositives – a prevalence study from Eastern India to support recent 2018 WHO guidelines
 
More details
Hide details
1
Centre of Excellence in HIV Care, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
 
2
Regional Paediatric Centre in HIV Care, Kolkata Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
 
3
Department of Tropical Medicine, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
 
 
Submission date: 2018-11-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2019-10-19
 
 
Acceptance date: 2019-11-04
 
 
Publication date: 2020-06-28
 
 
HIV & AIDS Review 2020;19(2):87-92
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Cryptococcal meningitis, a leading opportunistic infection, causes significant morbidity and mortality in people with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). It accounts for an estimated 15% of acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related deaths globally. As recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) 2018 guidelines, this invasive disease is preventable by routine cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) screening of all advanced HIV patients followed by pre-emptive antifungal therapy. An estimate of disease prevalence in antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naïve HIV-positive adult Indian population is essential to include this in routine screening strategy. We estimated CrAg prevalence as a guiding resource in a public health approach.

Material and methods:
The study design was longitudinal. ART naïve HIV-seropositive patients with CD4 count ≤ 100 cells/μl, attending ART center at the School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, India were screened for CrAg using both latex agglutination and lateral flow assay kits. A total of 390 subjects were enrolled into the study, and evaluated for association of CrAg with age, sex, CD4, presence of opportunistic infections, WHO HIV staging, and clinical symptoms.

Results:
Of 390 subjects tested, the median CD4 count was 42 cells/μl in CrAg-positive and 46 in CrAg-negative patients. Median (IQR) age of all participants was 40 (range, 34-46) years. CrAg positivity was 12.56%, comparatively higher in those with CD4 ≤ 50 cells/μl. Asymptomatic patients had CrAg positivity of 4.6%. Statistically significant association was noted with male sex (p = 0.03), triad symptoms of fever, headache, vomiting (p = 0.013), and altered mental status (p = 0.033).

Conclusions:
This study aims to estimate CrAg prevalence in India to justify the need for routine screening and pre-emptive treatment in advanced HIV infection. Incorporating this screening would definitely reduce the risk of cryptococcus meningitis-induced mortality and morbidity, as recommended by the WHO guidelines.

REFERENCES (22)
1.
Rajasingham R, Smith RM, Park BJ, et al. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17: 873-881.
 
2.
HIV Sentinel Surveillance and HIV Estimation. NACO, 2006.
 
3.
Kauffman L, Blumer S. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on mycosis. Washington: Pan American Health Organisation and Science publication; 1978, 176-187.
 
4.
Vidal JE, Penalva de Oliveira AC, Dauar RF, Boulware DR. Strategies to reduce mortality and morbidity due to AIDS-related cryptococcal meningitis in Latin America. Braz J Infect Dis 2013; 17: 353-362.
 
5.
WHO. Rapid advice: Diagnosis, prevention and management of cryptococcal disease in HIV infected adults, adolescents and children. 2011.
 
6.
Cox GM, Perfect JR. Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans and gattii and Trichosporon species. In: Ajello, Land-May RJ (eds.). Topley and Wilson’s Microbiology and Microbial Infections. London: Arnold; 1999, 461-484.
 
7.
Boulware DR, Meya DB, Muzoora C, et al.; COAT Trial Team. Timing of antiretroviral therapy after diagnosis of cryptococcal meningitis. N Engl J Med 2014, 370: 2487-2498.
 
8.
Lawn S, Harries A, Anglaret X, Myer L, Wood R. Early mortality among adults accessing antiretroviral treatment programs in sub-Saharan Africa. AIDS 2008; 22: 1897-1908.
 
9.
Sawadogo S, Makumbi B, Purfield A, et al. Estimated prevalence of cryptococcus antigenemia (CrAg) among HIV-infected adults with advanced immunosuppression in Namibia justifies routine screening and preemptive treatment. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0161830.
 
10.
Pongsai P, Atamasirikul K, Sungkanuparph S. The role of serum cryptococcal antigen screening for the early diagnosis of cryptococcosis in HIV-infected patients with different ranges of CD4 cell counts. J Infect 2010; 60: 474-477.
 
11.
Micol R, Lortholary O, Sar B, et al. Prevalence, determinants of positivity, and clinical utility of cryptococcal antigenemia in Cambodian HIV-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007; 45: 555-559.
 
12.
Kwan CK, Leelawiwat W, Intalapaporn P, et al. Utility of cryptococcal antigen screening and evolution of asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia among HIV-infected women starting antiretroviral therapy in Thailand. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care 2014; 13: 434-437.
 
13.
Thakur R, Sarma S, Kushwaha S. Prevalence of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis and utility of microbiological determinants for its diagnosis in a tertiary care center. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008; 51: 212-214.
 
14.
Anuradha S, Narayana A, Dewan R, Kaur R, Rajeshwari K. Asymptomatic cryptococcal antigenemia in people living with HIV (PLHIV) with severe immunosuppression: is routine CrAg screening indicated in India? J Assoc Phys India 2017; 65: 14-17.
 
15.
WHO, March 2018; Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Prevention and Management of Cryptococcal disease in HIV infected adults, adolescents and children. India 2017; 65.
 
16.
Tanner DC, Weinstein MP, Fedorciw B, Joho KL, Thorpe JJ, Reller L. Comparison of commercial kits for detection of cryptococcal antigen. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 32: 1680-1684.
 
17.
Temstet A, Roux P, Poirot JL, Ronin O, Dromer F. Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody-based latex agglutination test for the diagnosis of cryptococcosis: comparison with two tests using polyclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30: 2544-2550.
 
18.
French N, Gray K, Watera C, et al. Cryptococcal infection in a cohort of HIV-1-infected Ugandan adults. AIDS 2002; 16: 1031-1038.
 
19.
McKenney J, Smith RM, Chiller TM, et al.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence and correlates of cryptococcal antigen positivity among AIDS patients – United States, 1986-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 63: 585-587.
 
20.
Lindsley MD, Mekha N, Baggett HC, et al. Evaluation of a newly developed lateral flow immunoassay for the diagnosis of cryptococcosis. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53: 321-325.
 
21.
Jarvis JN, Percival A, Bauman S, et al. Evaluation of a novel point of-care cryptococcal antigen test on serum, plasma, and urine from patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 53: 1019-1023.
 
22.
Ford N, Shubber Z, Jarvis JN, et al. CD4 cell count threshold for cryptococcal antigen screening of HIV-infected individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 66 (Suppl 2): S152-159.
 
eISSN:1732-2707
ISSN:1730-1270
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top