REVIEW PAPER
Fetus exposure to HIV infection by mother during pregnancy – legal aspects
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Forensic Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
2
Department of Medical Law, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
Submission date: 2019-09-17
Acceptance date: 2019-11-15
Publication date: 2020-10-02
HIV & AIDS Review 2020;19(3):147-152
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
From the medical and legal points of view, mother to child way of pathogens’ transmission is specific. In case of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the highest risk of infection occurs during labor; hence, implementation of pharmacological prophylaxis for the mother and child is of high importance. Criminal law protection of a pregnant woman is of special nature, as it concerns two dependent entities, yet unequal before the law: the mother and the child. Legislators clearly give priority to the mother's life and health over the life and health of nasciturus. The beginning of labor or the moment when objective indications for early delivery occur, are considered to be the beginning of legal protection of life and health of a child, provided that the fetus has reached fetal viability. Only then, it is entitled to full legal protection. A HIV-infected woman who refuses therapy and, therefore, puts her child at risk of becoming infected, may be liable to prosecution. Liability under Article 161 § 1 of the Penal Code arises only when the child acquires the rights of a born person (human rights). Should the infection be transmitted in the perinatal period or after the birth, a mother may be held liable for moderate or even serious damage to the child's health. A physician is required by law to provide his patient with detailed information regarding the ways of HIV transmission, the options to protect the child against infection, and the risks associated with refusal to undergo therapy.
REFERENCES (13)
1.
www.pzh.gov.pl (Accessed: 30.08.2019).
2.
Coutsoudis A, Kwaan L, Thomson M. Prevention of vertical transmission of HIV-1 in resource-limited settings. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2010; 8: 1163-1175.
4.
Rahangdale L, Cohan D. Rapid human immunodeficiency virus testing on labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 159-163.
5.
The Regulation of the Minister of Health of 16 August 2018 on the Organizational standard of perinatal care, Journal of Laws 1756; 2018.
6.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of 26 October 2006, ref. I KZP 18/06, OSNKW 11 (2006), 90.
7.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of 30 October 2008, ref. I KZP 13/08, OSNKW 11 (2008), 90.
8.
Jurek T. Opiniowanie sądowo-lekarskie w przypadkach narażenia na bezpośrednie niebezpieczeństwo utraty życia albo ciężkiego uszczerbku na zdrowiu. 1st ed. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego; 2013.
9.
Zielińska E. AIDS i ciąża – problemy prawnokarne. In: Szwarc AJ (ed.). AIDS i prawo karne. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie; 1996, pp. 106, 109.
10.
Kokot R. Komentarz do rozdziału XIX – Przestępstwa przeciwko życiu i zdrowiu.. In: Stefański RA (ed.). Kodeks karny. Komentarz 2016 r. Warszawa: Legalis; 2019.
11.
Budyn-Kulik M, Michalski B, Pikulski S, Potulski J. Komentarz do art. 161 kodeksu karnego. In: Warylewski J (ed.). Przestępstwa przeciwko dobrom indywidualnym. System Prawa Karnego. Warszawa: Legalis; 2012.
12.
The Act of 6 November 2008 on Patient’s Rights and Patient’s Right Spokesman, Journal of Laws 849; 2020.
13.
The Act of 5 December 2008 on Preventing and Combating Infections and Infectious Diseases among People, Journal of Laws 1239; 2019.