RESEARCH PAPER
Experiences of HIV/AIDS medical and nursing service during COVID-19 among people living with HIV and health providers: a qualitative study in Thailand
 
More details
Hide details
1
Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Sanpasithiprasong, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajanok Institute, Thailand
 
2
Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Suphanburi, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajanok Institute, Thailand
 
 
Submission date: 2022-06-26
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-08-31
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-09-01
 
 
Online publication date: 2024-08-09
 
 
Corresponding author
Natawan Khumsaen   

Boromarajonani College of Nursing, Suphanburi, Faculty of Nursing, Praboromarajanok Institute
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
COVID-19 has a global health impact on vulnerable populations, including people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLHIV). Its restrictions have affected attendance and delivery of HIV health services in Thailand. The objectives of the current phenomenological qualitative study were to understand experiences of HIV healthcare service during COVID-19 among PLHIV and healthcare providers. This study also explored the model of HIV healthcare during COVID-19.

Material and methods:
Narrative interviews were conducted among 34 participants. We intentionally recruited the participants who had experiences related to HIV healthcare service during the pandemic. Participants (nurses, physicians, and PLHIV) in ART clinics were requested to describe their experiences related to HIV healthcare service. Each interview lasted between 30 and 40 min. A thematic content analy­sis was applied to analyze data.

Results:
Three themes were considered: 1) new normal in HIV healthcare service; 2) participative mana­gement of HIV healthcare service; 3) factors contributing to the success of HIV healthcare delivery. Theme 1 included four sub-topics: 1) reducing HIV healthcare service step; 2) rotation of PLHIV group service; 3) using alternative methods to obtain medications; and 4) modification of HIV service environment. Theme 2 consisted of two sub-topics: 1) communication within the organization to reach mutual understanding; and 2) networking. Theme 3 included three sub-topics: 1) effort of team members to deliver excellent service; 2) administrator’s support; and 3) awareness of self-management among patients.

Conclusions:
This study provides a background for the implementation of nursing interventions, which will be designed to re-shape flexible HIV healthcare service for PLHIV during COVID-19.

 
REFERENCES (27)
1.
WHO. HIV/AIDS data and statistics. World Health Organization. 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/hiv/data/e....
 
2.
UNAIDS. Factsheet: Global AIDS update. Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS. 2019.
 
3.
Global information and education on HIV and AIDS in Thailand. 2020. Available at: https://www.avert.org/professi....
 
4.
Johns Hopkins University of Medicine. Corona virus resource center. COVID-19 dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE). Johns Hopkins University; 2021. Available at: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/ma....
 
5.
Department of Disease Control of Thailand. Covid-19 Infected Situation Reports. 2021. Available at: https://covid19.ddc.moph.go.th....
 
6.
Srisawat N, Iamsirithaworn S, Tantawichiein T, Thisyakorn U. COVID-19: Lessons from Thailand. Ann Acad Med Singap 2021; 50: 96-98.
 
7.
Srichannil C. The COVID-19 pandemic and Thailand: a psychologist’s viewpoint. Psychol Trauma 2020; 12: 485-487.
 
8.
Pollard R, Gopinath U, Reddy YA, Kumar BR, Mugundu P, Vasudevan CK, et al. HIV service delivery in the time of COVID-19: focus group discussions with key populations in India. J Int AIDS Soc 2021; 24 (Suppl. 6): e25800. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25800.
 
9.
Qiao S, Yang X, Sun S, Li X, Mi T, Zhou Y, Shen Z. Challenges to HIV service delivery and the impacts on patient care during COVID-19: perspective of HIV care providers in Guangxi, China. AIDS Care 2021; 33: 559-565.
 
10.
Nitpolprasert C, Anand T, Phanuphak N, Reiss P, Ananworanich J, Peay HL. A qualitative study of the impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on psychological and financial wellbeing and engagement in care among men who have sex with men living with HIV in Thailand. HIV Med 2022; 23: 227-236.
 
11.
Khan SN. Qualitative research method-phenomenology. Asian Soc Sci 2014; 10: 298-310.
 
12.
Aspers P. Empirical phenomenology: a qualitative research approach. Indo-Pac J Phenomenol 2009; 9: 1-12.
 
13.
van Manen M. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. London: Rutledge; 1997.
 
14.
Devers KJ, Frankel RM. Study design in qualitative research – 2: sampling and data collection strategies. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2000; 13: 263-271.
 
15.
Gershon RR, Flanagan PA, Karkashian C, Grimes M, Wilburn S, Frerotte J, et al. Health care workers’ experience with postexposure management of bloodborne pathogen exposures: a pilot study. Am J Infect Control 2000; 28: 421-428.
 
16.
Onwuegbuzie AJ, Collins KM. A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report 2007; 12: 281-316.
 
17.
Grove SK, Burns N, Gray JR. The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence (7th ed.). St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2013.
 
18.
Anderson C, Kirkpatrick S. Narrative interviewing. Int J Clin Pharm 2016; 38: 631-634.
 
19.
Edward KL, Welch T. The extension of Colaizzi’s method of phenomenological enquiry. Contemp Nurse 2011; 39: 163-171.
 
20.
Izudi J, Kiragga AN, Okoboi S, Bajunirwe F, Castelnuovo B. Adaptations to HIV services delivery amidst the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in Kampala, Uganda: a qualitative study. PLOS Glob Public Health 2022; 2: e0000908. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000908.
 
21.
Kowalska J, Skrzat-Klapaczyńska A, Bursa D, Balayan T, Begovac J, Chkhartishvili N, et al. HIV care in times of the COVID-19 crisis – where are we now in Central and Eastern Europe? Int J Infect Dis 2020; 96: 311-314.
 
22.
UNAIDS. Survey shows that many people lack multi month HIV treatment in Latin America. 2020. Available at: https://www.unaids.org/en/reso....
 
23.
Fadul N, Regan N, Kaddoura L, Swindells S. A Midwestern Academic HIV Clinic operation during the COVID-19 pandemic: implementation strategy and preliminary outcomes. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care 2021; 20. DOI: 10.1177/23259582211041423.
 
24.
Hung C, Banerjee S, Gilada I, Green K, Inoue Y, Kamarulzaman A, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on the HIV care continuum in Asia: insights from people living with HIV, key populations, and HIV healthcare providers. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0270831. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270831.
 
25.
Ruiz-Martin C, López-Paredes A, Wainer G. What we know and do not know about organizational resilience. Int J Prod Manag Eng 2018; 6: 11-28.
 
26.
Abraham SA, Berchie GO, Doe PF, Agyare E, Addo SA, Obiri-Yeboah D. Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on ART Service delivery: perspectives of healthcare workers in a Teaching Hospital in Ghana. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21: 1295. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07330-2.
 
27.
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res 2016; 26: 1753-1760.
 
eISSN:1732-2707
ISSN:1730-1270
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top