RESEARCH PAPER
Profile characteristics of migrants, especially occupation and HIV status, accessing targeted interventions in Mumbai and Thane in India
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2017-12-14
 
 
Final revision date: 2018-02-16
 
 
Acceptance date: 2018-02-22
 
 
Publication date: 2018-09-25
 
 
HIV & AIDS Review 2018;17(3):189-196
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Under National AIDS Control Program IV (NACP IV) during 2012-2017 in India, human immu­nodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention strategies under targeted intervention (TI) programs for migrants of different profiles were uniform. Role of the profile of migrants, especially their occupation, in the spread of HIV epidemic was not well-explored. The present study investigated the linkages between profile characteristics and occupations with HIV infection status of the migrants in Mumbai and Thane in Maharashtra, India.

Material and methods:
This was a cross-sectional epidemiological study conducted among 24,864 migrants (males 23,908, 96.1%, and females 956, 3.9%) covered under the TI programs implemented in Mumbai and Thane districts of Maharashtra, India from April to December 2016. SPSS 20.0 version was used for analysis. At 95% confidence interval, c2 test, Fishers exact test, and multiple logistic regression model were used for finding out factors associated with HIV infection status.

Results:
Among the females, HIV infection rates were 4.4% and 1.3% in Mumbai and Thane, respectively, whereas for males, it was 0.3% in both the places. Predictors of HIV infection status in Mumbai were gender and type of persons staying with the migrant at the residence. For Thane, apart from these two, accompanying person during mobility played a certain role. In Thane, occupation in small to medium scale industry was the predictor of HIV infection but not in Mumbai.

Conclusions:
Additional strategies for migrant intervention program had been left out in opportunities for NACP in India. We recommend that special strategies need to be developed in NACP to address these predictors of HIV infection.

 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
NACO. National AIDS Control Organization. Migrant Strategy for Targeted Interventions. NACP. National AIDS Control Program Phase IV. 2012-1. pp 20-23.
 
2.
Census of India. http://censusindia.gov.in/Cens.... (Accessed on 8th February 2017).
 
3.
HIV Sentinel Surveillance. A technical brief 2014-15. New Delhi: NACO. National AIDS Control Organization, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. 2015; p 12.
 
4.
Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). National AIDS Control Organization. India HIV Estimations. Technical Report 2015. pp 17-35.
 
5.
UNAIDS. UNAIDS Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. 2012; pp 243-55.
 
6.
NACO (2009). National AIDS Control Organization. Targeted Interventions under NACPIII, Operational Guidelines, Vol 1, Core High Risk Groups. 2009; pp 209-223.
 
7.
Abdulkader R, Goswami K, Goswami K, et al. HIV-Risk Behavior Among the Male Migrant Factory Workers in a North Indian City. Indian J Community Med 2015; 40: 108-115.
 
8.
Saggurti N, Verma RK, Jain A, et al. HIV risk behaviors among contracted and non-contracted male migrant workers in India: Potential role of labour contractors and contractual systems in HIV prevention. AIDS 2011; 22: 127-136.
 
9.
Nishigaya K. Female garment factory workers in Cambodia: migration, sex work and HIV/AIDS. Women Health 2002; 35: 27-42.
 
10.
Awasthi KR, Adefemi K, Tamrakar M. HIV/AIDS: A Persistent Health Issue for Women and Children in Mid and Far Western Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2015; 13: 88-93.
 
11.
Singh DP. Migration and occupation in Mumbai: issues and implications. Tata Institute of Social Sciences. 2015; pp 3-4. demoscope.ru/weekly/knigi/tours_2005/papers/iussp2005s50938 (Accessed on 24th February 2017).
 
12.
Yang H, Li X, Stanton B, et al. Workplace and HIV-related sexual behaviors and perceptions among female migrant workers. AIDS Care 2005; 17: 819-833.
 
13.
Weine S, Golobof A, Bahromov M, et al. Female migrant sex workers in Moscow: gender and power factors and HIV risk. Women Health 2013; 53: 56-73.
 
14.
Organista KC, Organista PB, Garcia DAJ. AIDS and condom-related knowledge, beliefs, and behaviors in Mexican migrant laborers. Hisp J Behav Sci 1996; 18: 392-406.
 
15.
Hirsch JS. Labor migration, externalities and ethics: theorizing the meso-level determinants of HIV vulnerability. Soc Sci Med 2014; 100: 38-45.
 
16.
Rao N, Jeyaseelan L, Joy A, et al. Factors associated with high-risk behaviour among migrants in the state of Maharashtra, India. J Biosoc Sci 2013; 45: 627-641.
 
17.
Ford K, Chamrathrithirong A. Sexual partners and condom use of migrant workers in Thailand. AIDS Behav 2007; 11: 905-914.
 
18.
Abela MI. Labour migration from South and South-East Asia: some policy issues. Int Labour Rev 1984; 123: 491-506.
 
19.
Mgalla Z, Pool R. Sexual relationships, condom use and risk perception among female bar workers in north-west Tanzania. AIDS Care 1997; 9: 407-416.
 
20.
Yang H, Li X, Stanton B, et al. Workplace and HIV-related sexual behaviours and perceptions among female migrant workers. AIDS Care 2005; 17: 819-833.
 
21.
National AIDS Control Organization (NACO). Government of India. Targeted Intervention for Migrants. Operational Guidelines 2007; 11-42.
 
22.
Social Assessment for NACP IV. Social Assessment Report. National AIDS Control Programme NACP III. Department of AIDS Control. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Government of India, 2012; 12-51.
 
eISSN:1732-2707
ISSN:1730-1270
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top