RESEARCH PAPER
Compliance with successful policy method. Implementation of HIV/AIDS control policies: a case study
More details
Hide details
1
Regional Research and Development Agency, South Kalimantan Province, Indonesia
2
Untidar University, Magelang, Indonesia
3
Brawijaya University, Indonesia
Submission date: 2022-04-28
Final revision date: 2022-06-10
Acceptance date: 2022-06-10
Online publication date: 2025-03-19
Corresponding author
Nana Noviana
Regional Research
and Development Agency, South Kalimantan Province, Indonesia
HIV & AIDS Review 2025;24(1):20-28
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The involvement and complexity of multiple stakeholders in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) policy implementation are needed; however, a deviation from stakeholder's point of view becomes a problem in achieving policy implementation goals. To improve the performance of implementers in efforts to control HIV/AIDS in Banjarmasin City, this study analyzed the compliance of implementers in executing HIV/AIDS control policies, and this is something that agencies in Banjarmasin has never accomplished.
Material and methods:
To investigate policy data, guidelines, and implementation of HIV/AIDS prevention programs in Banjarmasin City, a system analysis method was used. Selection of information was based on various considerations as per the needs of required information taken from individuals, who better understand implementation of HIV/AIDS control programs in Banjarmasin. Sampling technique was part of concurrent triangulation design (Creswell, 2012; Creswell, 2018). Data collection techniques for conducting interviews were used as an interview guide. Observation method employed in this study was simultaneously connected with enriching the research by presenting additional
data to support the information obtained from interviews.
Results:
From the implementers point of view, HIV/AIDS control efforts are not yet priority, as there are still high urgency agency programs. In addition, the implementation considered HIV/AIDS control program only to continue a previous one. Various factors, which underlined the compliance in the implementers in using HIV/AIDS control policies were due to the absence of socialization in regional regulations, so that the majority of informants did not know about them. Moreover, the contents and objectives of regional regulations are unclear and not detailed, so it is difficult to interpret aims and objectives. Additionally, there is unclear role of administrators in the implementation of HIV/AIDS control and the absence of mayor regulations and technical guidelines to follow Regional Regulation No. 11/2012.
Conclusions:
Local regulations cannot be implemented optimally. It is necessary to have clear regulations in the implementation of HIV/AIDS control policies in order to increase the compliance of the implementers in policy application.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Directorate General of Disease Prevention and Environmental Health, Ministry of Health of the Republic of the Jakarta Technical Guidance for the HIV/AIDS Control Program and PIMS First Level Health Facilities.
2.
The Health Office in Banjarmasin City, South Kalimantan Province. Annual activity report. Banjarmasin National HIV and AIDS Commission, National Strategy and Action Plan 2015-2019: Combating HIV and AIDS in Indonesia, Jakarta, 2015.
3.
Noviana N, Suwitri S. Implementasi Kebijakan Kesehatan dalam Pengendalian HIV/AIDS. PT. Pena Persada. Jawa Tengah; 2019.
4.
Djellouli N, Quevedo-Gómez MC. Challenges to successful implementation of HIV and AIDS-related health policies in Cartagena, Colombia. Soc Sci Med 2015; 133: 36-44.
5.
Presidential Regulation No. 75 of 2006 concerning the National AIDS Commission.
6.
Ripley RB. Policy Analysis in Political Science. Chicago: Nelson-Hall; 1986.
7.
Noviana N, Supriyono B. Policy of learning systems: policy implementor perspective on HIV/AIDS. International Conference on HIV/AIDS. European Conference on Interdisciplinary Scientific Research. Ankara, Turkey July 4-5, 2020.
8.
Creswell J. Research Design: Qualitative and Mixed Approach. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2014.
9.
Denscombe M. Panduan Penelitian Baik: untuk skala penelitian sosial kecil, edisi ke-4. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2010.
10.
Report of the Asian Commission on AIDS. Redefining AIDS in Asia: Crafting an Effective Response. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2008.
11.
Erwan AP. Implementation of Public Policy “Concept and Its Application in Indonesia”. Yogyakarta: Gava Media; 2012.
12.
Kabayakgosi G, Mpule KP. Beyond public administration? HIV/AIDS policy networks and the transformation of public administration in Botswana. Public Administration and Development 2008; 28: 301-310.
13.
Banjarmasin City Government. Banjarmasin City Regional Regulation No. 11 of 2012 concerning HIV/AIDS Control in Banjarmasin City. 2012.
14.
Goggin ML, Bowman AO, Lester JP, O'Toole LJ Jr. (eds.). Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Little, Brown; 1990.
15.
Nigro FA. Modern Public Administration. 5th ed. New York: Harper & Row Publishers; 1980.
16.
Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds.). Delibarative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003.
17.
UNAIDS. On the Fast-Track to End AIDS. 2014.
19.
Policy Research Report of the World Bank. Confronting AIDS: Public Priorities in a Global Epidemic. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.
20.
Banjarmasin City AIDS Commission. Narrative Report of the NFM Phase Global Fund Support Program Quarter 8 Semester 4. Banjarmasin; 2019.
21.
Paxton S, Stephens D. Challenges to the meaningful involvement of HIV positive people in the response to HIV/AIDS in Cambodia, India, and Indonesia. Asia Pac J Public Health 2007; 19: 8-13.
22.
Banjarmasin City Health Office, South Kalimantan Province. Annual Activity Report. Banjarmasin; 2017.